[From nobody Thu Jul  3 13:39:40 2003
Return-Path: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>
Received: from mail3.bellatlantic.net ([151.199.0.38])
	by immta2.bellatlantic.net (InterMail v4.01.01.00 201-229-111)
	with ESMTP
	id <20000105003852.LJNH17980.immta2@mail3.bellatlantic.net>
	for <akestelo@bellatlantic.net>; Tue, 4 Jan 2000 19:38:52 -0500
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [212.172.148.70])
	by mail3.bellatlantic.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA08114
	for <akestelo@bellatlantic.net>; Tue, 4 Jan 2000 19:38:49 -0500 (EST)
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1)
	id 125eQn-00017T-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org;
	Wed, 05 Jan 2000 00:36:05 +0000
Received: from tk1.ihug.co.nz ([203.29.160.13] helo=smtp1.ihug.co.nz)
	by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 125eQl-00017O-00
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2000 00:36:04 +0000
Received: from test (p61-max4.chc.ihug.co.nz [207.214.13.188])
	by smtp1.ihug.co.nz (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian/GNU) with SMTP id NAA27673
	for <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>; Wed, 5 Jan 2000 13:35:43 +1300
Message-ID: <02c201bf5715$4065b400$0200a8c0@test>
From: "Dave Brown" <tractorb@ihug.co.nz>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <003101bf56fc$e1dbf7e0$f58d01d5@default>
Subject: LF: Re: The 137.0 signal ??? more
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2000 13:29:10 +1300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>


----- Original Message -----
From: Alan Melia <Alan.Melia@btinternet.com>
To: rsgb_lf_group <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Wednesday, 5 January 2000 10:43 AM
Subject: LF: The 137.0 signal ??? more

Gidday  from ZL.

Only other likely looking stateside station I can find on 137.000 exact (and
based on 3/4 yr old data) is  WSC as below.

137.000   TUCKERTON NJ     WSC    39N3800    074W1800

Anyone know if this is still up and running or is it a dead 'un too?
Rated pwr is much the same as CFH according to my data.

73
Dave
ZL3FJ



]